Skip to main content

SOC 2 Overview

Written by Brady Price

Why is SOC 2 Important?

SOC 2 is an auditor report on your organization's controls for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and/or privacy, and how effective those controls are.

To meet SOC 2 requirements, you implement security controls and collect evidence that they are in place. Controls can be operational (security training, org chart) or technical (vulnerability scans, encryption, backups).

Customers often ask for SOC 2 to understand how you protect their data. Use this overview to learn what the report covers and how Secureframe helps you prepare.


The SOC 2 Compliance Process

  • Scoping: Identify the systems, processes, and Trust Services Criteria to be evaluated.

  • Gap Analysis: Assess existing controls and identify gaps that need remediation.

  • Implementation: Address gaps by implementing policies, procedures, and technical safeguards.

  • Readiness Assessment: Conduct a pre-audit review to confirm preparedness.

  • Audit: A third-party auditor evaluates your controls and issues the SOC 2 report.


SOC 2, Type 1 vs Type 2

There are two types of SOC 2 attestation reports: SOC 2 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 2

Each serves a specific purpose and you’ll need to decide which report you want before starting the audit process.

  • What is SOC 2 Type 1? SOC 2 Type 1 evaluates security controls at a single point in time to determine whether the internal controls safeguarding customer data are designed suitably. A Type 1 report does not contain an opinion on the operating effectiveness of controls or a detailed description of the tests of controls performed by the service auditor. Type 1 reports can be generated in a matter of weeks.

  • What is SOC 2 Type 2? A SOC 2 Type 2 report examines not only whether the internal controls safeguarding customer data are designed suitably, but also how well a service organization's compliance controls perform over a period of time (typically 3-12 months). Do they function as intended? How effective are they? Type 2 audits can take 12 months to complete and are more expensive than Type 1 audits.


SOC 2 Hub Overview

Visit our SOC 2 Hub for the fundamentals of SOC 2 compliance, curated best practices, and resources for security beginners, all in one place.

  • Overview

  • Report Structures

  • Audit Process, Timeline, Cost,

  • How to prepare

  • Automation

  • Resources and more


Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)

Does it matter which order I do my SOC 2, Type 1 or Type 2 in?

  • No, the order does not matter, it is preference.

  • It is not a requirement to pursue SOC 2 Type 1 before getting a SOC 2 Type 2 report because they are stand-alone reports.

  • A company may choose to go straight for SOC 2 Type 2 audit without completing a SOC 2 Type

Which SOC 2 (Type 1 or Type 2) should I Choose?

  • There are multiple factors to consider with this question so lets look at a few.

  • Type 1 and Type 2 reports both require an audit by a qualified service auditor or CPA firm. Often, the decision one which to chose is about the timeline the report is needed.

  • If a customer or requester does not specify, it’s likely a requester wants you to have a SOC 2 Type 2. Sometimes companies get a SOC 2 Type 1 and commit to getting a Type 2 within a year, so they can begin working with the requester.

  • If you need to demonstrate compliance because an important enterprise prospect requires it to close the deal, but your company just recently implemented the formal systems necessary for the SOC 2, or you’ve recently made major changes to your data security systems. In this case, a Type 1 report that evaluates your information security controls as they stand today can be a short-term solution.

  • When deciding on a SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2, make sure you understand the expectations of the potential customer who is requesting it. Since a Type 1 does not require you to demonstrate your compliance over time, it provides a lower level of comfort to the potential customer and may not meet their vendor due diligence needs.

Did this answer your question?